Jiri Vesely vs Ainius Sabaliauskas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Sabaliauskas wins 41.46% of second serve points recently, while Vesely a higher 45.77%, suggesting a possible advantage for Vesely. Could this be a deciding factor?
• In return games, Sabaliauskas slightly outperforms Vesely on opponents' second serves with a win rate of 44.95% compared to Vesely's 44.71%.
• When returning first serves, Vesely leads with 27.36% over Sabaliauskas’s 24.91%, indicating a superior return game against strong serves.
• Under pressure, Vesely excels by saving 67.65% of breakpoints, superior to Sabaliauskas’s 50.91%, hinting at a strong mental game.
• Match wins are close with Sabaliauskas at 57.45% and Vesely slightly lower at 56.67% in the past year.
• Clay surfaces favor Vesely, who has a 59% career win rate, compared to Sabaliauskas's 56% success on clay.
• Sabaliauskas largely competes at the Futures level with a matching 57.45% win rate, whereas Vesely mostly contends in Challenger events, winning 57.14%.
• Vesely has faced lower-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 340.4, whereas Sabaliauskas's opponents have an average rank of 125.7, suggesting a tougher competition.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Sabaliauskas has a slight edge, winning 50% of them recently, over Vesely's 45% success rate.
• Vesely is more effective in converting breakpoints recently, with a conversion rate of 35.14%, versus Sabaliauskas's 31.25%.

Editorial Prediction (September 3, 2025, UTC):

In this upcoming match, both Sabaliauskas and Vesely demonstrate competitive levels of play, with their performance stats showing various edges for each contender.

Vesely's strength on second serves and his ability to handle pressure, evidenced by higher breakpoint save percentages, suggest he can maintain composure during crucial moments.

Furthermore, his return game against first serves and his efficiency at converting break opportunities point towards a robustness that could prove advantageous.

However, Sabaliauskas's competition history against higher-ranked players may provide resilience and adaptability, a critical asset against varied opponents.

While both players excel on clay, Vesely’s superior record on this surface gives him a slight edge in these conditions.

Considering the comprehensive analysis of player stats, Vesely emerges as the more likely winner in this closely matched contest.